http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/index.shtml?partner=rss Newest Items Copyright 2008 FatherMag.com en-us http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260040.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-07 15:08| Mod My message is not that you should censor Richardīs posts, merely that we should not humour him by responding. It has all been said many times. Personally I will not be responding to any of Richardīs posts going forward. He may well put forward theories about http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260037.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-06 05:47| You poor old b*gger, Stumpy! If you really believe this drivel, there is no hope for you. The best thing you can do is to have your mind steam-cleaned - or preferably return to the primæval swamp from whence you came (circlist) where you will find the company mo http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260035.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-06 01:08| Well Jenny, if you canīt stand the heat, perhaps you should leave the kitchen! http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260034.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-06 01:06| Jeny, I agree that we are all "entitled to our opinions" and I am pleased that I seem to have made you aware of mine. It is true that I only have first hand knowledge of my own penis and it is also true that I have no experience of the penises of others, as you claim to http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260031.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 21:24| Well Iīm glad someone else has finally figured him out. Without fanning of his flame, his fire will soon go out. http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260030.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 21:24| "Your opinions are also only based on a very narrow experience..." Exactly. His foreskin may have been less-than-desirable (or perhaps "problematic"), but "one manīs trash is another manīs treasure," and he has no business making generalized statements about the "v http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260029.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 21:18| "redundant foreskin" what kind of a politically incorrect phrase is that ? that term was definately created by pro-circers to bring shame on to all normally/naturally developed penisīs,just pure anti-foreskin idoctrination again.sorry frank not your fault ). http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260025.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 15:30| We all know Richardīs views. While he is entitled to his own views (he may well be happier without a foreskin), many people here do not think this is a generally held principle. As he is not going to change his views, and just keeps saying the same things over and o http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260024.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 14:21| Richard. Like you, I am entitled to my opinions. And God, do we know about yours And by the way, I suspect I have been intimate with significantly more penises than you (or maybe not, given some of the strange messages given off in previous threads - your "w http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260023.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 14:19| Hi found the CI chart on the Internet ~ Interesting! But, I think it is at least one set of photos short. In Collage, a dorm mate possessed what I believe might have been a CI 11. As our showers were communal, his appendage was on view daily, and was a ‘sometime’ t http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260019.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 06:11| correct i was covering all bases there in a general posting and your comments apply to these (except a few) and by no means to all but a tiny percentage of .i was genralising so as not to "antagonize" the oddballs on here but i mus http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260018.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 06:09| Surgery is not necessary to correct either a tight frenulum or a tight frenar band. Both are easily remedied through the use of skin expansion techniques which I teach on my website. http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260017.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 06:08| Jenny, You are a woman and have no penis. In your previous posts you have also said that you have no experience of sexual interaction with a circumcised man. Accordngly and with respect, you cannot be expected to understand why anyone, in any "coverage index" category, http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260016.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-05 06:07| You do seem to have a number of personal issues which might be more appropriately aired elsewhere Jed. I have no problem with a "robust" approach. However, it is notable that your moderator would relegate any reply in a similar vein from me. The so-called "derision" goe http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260011.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-04 23:01| hi jenny iīm a CI7 and my foreskin retracts back to behind the glans comfortably when erect.the CI chart pictures which i had never looked at before show the erect members with the foreskin still forward and this gives the impression it stays like that during sexual act http://forum.fathermag.com/circ/110/forum/messages/260006.shtml?partner=rss 2008-08-04 15:12| If you donīt like being treated robustly, Stumpy, you really must stop purveying outrageous drivel which those of us with good reason to do so find objectionable. You should understand that your natural home is circlist, where you can sit and chortle away with all t