Log in

Log in is not necessary, everyone can post in this forum.



RSS feed

get RSS reader:

Circumcision Forum

other Forum topics

To post a new message,
Go to newest page

newest messages:

  • Re: Home Truths - Jenny (UK) 2008-08-07 15:08
    Mod

    My message is not that you should censor Richardīs posts, merely that we should not humour him by responding. It has all been said many times.

    Personally I will not be responding to any of Richardīs posts going forward. He may well put forward theories about --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Jed 2008-08-06 05:47
    You poor old b*gger, Stumpy!

    If you really believe this drivel, there is no hope for you.

    The best thing you can do is to have your mind steam-cleaned - or preferably return to the primæval swamp from whence you came (circlist) where you will find the company mo --more...

  • · Tweed revisited · - Richard Yorkshire 2008-08-06 01:08
    Well Jenny, if you canīt stand the heat, perhaps you should leave the kitchen!
    --more...
  • · The promiscuous-pissing competition · - Richard Yorkshire 2008-08-06 01:06
    Jeny, I agree that we are all "entitled to our opinions" and I am pleased that I seem to have made you aware of mine. It is true that I only have first hand knowledge of my own penis and it is also true that I have no experience of the penises of others, as you claim to --more...
  • Re: Home Truths - Jim 2008-08-05 21:24
    Well Iīm glad someone else has finally figured him out. Without fanning of his flame, his fire will soon go out.
    --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Craig, Arlington 2008-08-05 21:24
    "Your opinions are also only based on a very narrow experience..."

    Exactly. His foreskin may have been less-than-desirable (or perhaps "problematic"), but "one manīs trash is another manīs treasure," and he has no business making generalized statements about the "v --more...

  • Re: Foreskin & the area it Covers! - normalboy 2008-08-05 21:18
    "redundant foreskin" what kind of a politically incorrect phrase is that ?

    that term was definately created by pro-circers to

    bring shame on to all normally/naturally developed penisīs,just pure anti-foreskin idoctrination again.sorry frank not your fault ).< --more...

  • · Home Truths · - Jenny (UK) 2008-08-05 15:30
    We all know Richardīs views. While he is entitled to his own views (he may well be happier without a foreskin), many people here do not think this is a generally held principle.

    As he is not going to change his views, and just keeps saying the same things over and o --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Jenny (UK) 2008-08-05 14:21
    Richard. Like you, I am entitled to my opinions. And God, do we know about yours!

    And by the way, I suspect I have been intimate with significantly more penises than you (or maybe not, given some of the strange messages given off in previous threads - your "w --more...

  • Foreskin & the area it Covers! - Frank - Florida - USA 2008-08-05 14:19
    Hi found the CI chart on the Internet ~ Interesting! But, I think it is at least one set of photos short. In Collage, a dorm mate possessed what I believe might have been a CI 11.

    As our showers were communal, his appendage was on view daily, and was a ‘sometime’ t --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - normalboy 2008-08-05 06:11
    correct! i was covering all bases there in a general posting and your comments apply to these (except a few) and by no means to all but a tiny percentage of

    that few if any.i was genralising so as not to

    "antagonize" the oddballs on here but i mus --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Jim 2008-08-05 06:09
    Surgery is not necessary to correct either a tight frenulum or a tight frenar band. Both are easily remedied through the use of skin expansion techniques which I teach on my website.
    --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Richard Yorkshire 2008-08-05 06:08
    Jenny, You are a woman and have no penis. In your previous posts you have also said that you have no experience of sexual interaction with a circumcised man. Accordngly and with respect, you cannot be expected to understand why anyone, in any "coverage index" category, --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Richard Yorkshire 2008-08-05 06:07
    You do seem to have a number of personal issues which might be more appropriately aired elsewhere Jed. I have no problem with a "robust" approach. However, it is notable that your moderator would relegate any reply in a similar vein from me. The so-called "derision" goe --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - normalboy 2008-08-04 23:01
    hi jenny iīm a CI7 and my foreskin retracts back to behind the glans comfortably when erect.the CI chart pictures which i had never looked at before show the erect members with the foreskin still forward and this gives the impression it stays like that during sexual act --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Jed 2008-08-04 15:12
    If you donīt like being treated robustly, Stumpy, you really must stop purveying outrageous drivel which those of us with good reason to do so find objectionable.

    You should understand that your natural home is circlist, where you can sit and chortle away with all t --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Jenny (UK) 2008-08-04 03:56
    Although CI7 foreskin does not seem excessively long, it is longer than I am used to. I always assume that when flaccid, the foreskin should cover the much of the glans but easily roll back to be unobtrusive and when erect, shaft skin should be nice and loose but foresk --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Richard Yorkshire 2008-08-03 05:38
    Jenny, before I was circumcised I suppose that I would have been approximately a "7". I am now between a "1" and "2". My foreskin was freely and fully retractable and functioned as such, however I found it uncomfortable at normal times and very intrusive during intercou --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Jim 2008-08-02 15:22
    Jenny, his circumcision had absolutely nothing to do with his foreskin. The problem runs a lot deeper than his physical realm, and no amount of reasoning could have kept him from his self-mutilation.

    Richard is simply the poster child for a sub-cultural group. Unf --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Jed 2008-08-02 05:18
    Read it again you silly bugger. Ever heard of sub-text? However despite any slight hint of sarcasm, I do hold Mod in high esteem because of his healthy attitude to the subject in question.

    Incidentally as the Sugar Plum Fairy will enthusiastically agree, bugger is --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Jenny (UK) 2008-08-02 04:03
    Richard, what was you foreskin like, in reference to the examples on the coverage index chart? May give some insight to why you were so keen to get rid.
    --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Richard Yorkshire 2008-08-02 04:01
    Well Jed, the usual foulness of your language is exceeded only by thre sycophancy of your grovelling words to the moderator! Have you no self-esteem? the man is only a preacher when all is said. --more...
  • Same page? - Jim 2008-08-02 04:00
    Mod, are you thinking the same thing I am -- why the emphasis? Over the years, Iīve run into several people with serious social disorders who also had habits of "creating" their perfect worlds through fantasy.


    .


    I am sure you are as aware as I am --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Richard Yorkshire 2008-08-01 06:03
    I donīt recall Mary saying that her husbands elephantine foreskin "enhanced sexual activity" Normalboy. Rather that she felt that it compensated to some extent for his unusually large size. In point of fact, sounded to be rather lukewarm about his uncircumcised state. N --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - normalboy 2008-07-31 13:36
    hey yorkie get some councelling from a good shrink thats what you need and quick.any talk of normal penises gets you in an awful state your in denial. you must learn that freedom of speech applies to both sides of the argument not just yours.it is legally acceptable fo --more...
  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Jed 2008-07-31 13:30
    What a silly response! As I read it, she is not complaining, but rather rejoicing in her good fortune. The words "smell" and "disgusting" have only been used by you and are totally uncalled for.

    If Mary has any sense she will treat your remarks with the contempt t --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Richard Yorkshire 2008-07-31 04:37
    Oh my goodness, how awful for you Mary! It must look, feel and smell disgusting. Didnīt you realise that your husband was uncircumcised before you were married, so that you could have asked him to have the circumcision which he so obviously needs? However, itīs not too --more...
  • Re: Fascinating article - normalboy 2008-07-31 04:35
    good article and based on what we already know of

    the handing down through familys of sexual abuse of children and wife beating etc not difficult to

    comprehend as being accurate.this type of article gets very slim publicity where a pro circ article would be ev --more...

  • Re: Foreskin Coverage - Mary - Florida 2008-07-30 21:46
    Newly married and notice my hubby has so much loose foreskin that extends inches beyond his penis head by at least three inches.

    But not complaining he is so huge so that extra foreskin acts as a buffer in me.


    .


    Can you perhaps explain whether --more...

  • Re: Other possibilities - Jim 2008-07-30 15:51
    Where is it? All I have found is the one of the beached whale.


    .


    Indeed. I think you have to join a few particular Yahoo groups - unless these have been purged recently.

    In any case, I am hardly going to advertise the fellow.
    --more...

  • Re: Other possibilities - Richard Yorkshire 2008-07-30 15:29
    Whatever will this "Jim" guy come up with next? Well letīs try this one - the moon really is a balloon and "Jim" is really a teenage girl from Zimbabwe! Mad as brushes, the lot of you!
    --more...
  • Other possibilities - Jim 2008-07-30 05:20
    Have you considered that there may be no Mrs Yorkie?


    .


    Interesting question - have you looked at the photo albums?
    --more...

  • Re: Thanks, Mod - Richard Yorkshire 2008-07-30 03:38
    Believe whatever makes you feel good guys! Your ridiculous theories are a matter of the utmost inconsequence to me and I have no intention of dignifying them with any response.


    .


    Nevertheless, theories aside, it clearly was your posting, so --more...

  • Thanks, Mod - Korydon 2008-07-29 19:48
    ... for suggesting the obvious ... I refer to the likelihood that Yorik wrote the message himself, and attributed the statement to his wife. Sometimes I can get rather dense and either fail to see, or, even worse, trip over the body lying right in front of my face. Pe --more...
  • Ba$tards! - Jed 2008-07-29 13:21
    What a mean-spirited contemptible way to treat an innocent child! Of course there are a few hopeless neurotics who look upon the foreskin as the embodiment of evil, nature’s vilest practical joke, to be extirpated and eliminated as quickly as possible, lock stock and b --more...
  • Re: Perhaps - Craig, Arlington 2008-07-29 02:36
    Richard, if this was your best shot, you missed by a large margin.

    Itīs difficult to imagine how your response related to my comment in any reasonable way -- perhaps you were responding to the moderatorīs comments?

    The justification of infant circumcision beca --more...

  • Re: Perhaps - normalboy 2008-07-28 16:18
    narrow minded as usual. thanks for the not caring.


    .


    There's a whole lifetime of experience behind that.
    --more...

  • Re: No Perhaps About It - H 77 2008-07-28 16:17
    I consider the process of choosing the exposed glans to have been quite trivial, no immediate decision,no dwelling on it with the whole brain and body. Just a preference.

    Those who have made this type of choice as well as a majority of those who had the choice made --more...

  • Sticks & Stones - Frank - Florida - USA 2008-07-28 15:39
    Tsk, Tsk, Tsk - Name calling, especially from an adult in a public forum debate, is tasteless, sophomoric and diminishes any point the offender wishes to establish!
    --more...
  • Re: Perhaps - Richard Yorkshire 2008-07-28 04:59
    Dream on guys, dream on! You seem to be trying to convince yourselves that your "anteater" penises are somehow preferable to the circumcised variety - oh well, whatever eases your pain ...
    --more...
  • Re: Yes, You Protest Far Too Much - Richard Yorkshire 2008-07-28 04:58
    It is obvious that you have me confused with someone else Kory. However, the lady you quote does not seem to me to be expressing any sexual thrill regarding the procedure of cutting. Rather, she appears to be expressing a sexual interest in the fact that her husband is --more...
  • permanent damage from infant circumcision - normalboy 2008-07-28 04:47
    i have in the past posted messages in support of the intact child mostly as a general issue however after

    visiting a friend who has moved to a different part of britain to follow his dream of a sex change i feel some of his experiences should be posted here to illu --more...

  • Re: Perhaps - Craig, Arlington 2008-07-27 14:46
    "Most of us circed guys are enjoying ... a sexier look."

    And most straight men are more aroused by a woman with her vaginal opening wide open and exposed to view.

    Iīm not convinced that forcing a man to expose his glans penis to anyone who ever sees his penis in --more...

Legal Disclaimer

Powered by
BindNine.net

\n $srvcstring\n